Please Link Here To Make A Donation

 

 

___________

 

All Content is Copyright ©

Hal Dekker

and

BelieversHomePage.com

All Rights Reserved

 

Hit Counter

 

Home

 

My Statement of Belief

 

Site Contents

 

Introduction

 

Priorities

 

Fundamentals

 

A Literal Idiomatic Translation

of the New Testament

 

"No temple roofs, none whatsoever!"

 

2 Pet. 1:20-21 - Private Interpretation?

 

We are Commanded to Think for Ourselves!

 

How "Pure" Is Modern Christianity?

 

Agency and Jesus Christ, The Father's Agent

 

Jesus Christ Was an Icon!

 

Hebrews 1:2 - Through whom were made the ages...

 

The "Cross" That Jesus Christ Lifted and Carried

 

"Eat my flesh... drink my blood"

 

Jesus' Genealogy

 

Titus 2:13 - Does it really say that Jesus Christ is God?  

 

How to Receive Answers to Prayer

 

Believing & Discipleship  

How To Be A Disciple of Jesus Christ

 

Angel or Messenger?

 

The "I AM ..." Christian Fable

 

The Gifts of God

 

Communion - Our Daily "Bread"

 

Is Salvation "Wholeness"?

 

The Great Mystery!

 

Truly I say to you TODAY, ...

 

The Passion of the Christ - Were the Jewish Religious Leaders Responsible?  Absolutely!  But more than they, the devil.

 

We Wrestle Not Against Flesh and Blood!

 

 

The Symbiotic Union to Speak the Word of Reconciliation 

 

The "First" Shall be "Last"

 

Parable of the Lost Things - Luke 15 

 

 

Jesus Christ and his oxygen bottle?

 

Jesus' Figurative Usage Axiom!

 

Appendixes

 

The Father's Wonderful Names and Titles

 

Genesis 1 & 2, The Original Creation, or the Recreation of It?

 

Prophecy:

Earthquake Frequency

 

 

Hurricane Activity

 

Southlawn Lessons

Judges 4

Jeremiah 23

 

The Birth of Americanism & Thanksgiving

 

 The "Federal Reserve" is NOT a part of the US Federal government!

 

Homosexual Lifestyle

Statistics

 

Resources

 

Invest In CDs And Lose?

 

eMail Me

 

Links

 

 

Angel or Messenger?

 

In the KJV the noun angelos, Strong's # 32, is translated as angel 179 times, and as messenger only 7 times.  But I believe whenever possible we must allow the contextual usage to help define the writer's intended explicit meaning of the words chosen to write.  Simply looking in a concordance to see how various translators translated a word tells us only their opinions of how they translated a word into English, driven most always by theological persuasion.  But allowing God's Word to have the overruling authority of a word's meaning, based upon how a word is used repeatedly in its given contexts, allows a translator to actually quote the writer's intended meaning of a word, and there is no need for theological interpretation on the part of a translator.  I believe tradition has mistakenly taught, either directly or indirectly that he meaning of the English word "angel" is simply a kind of heavenly being created by the God the Father to be used for His purposes.  That's a half-truth on account of that it is way too narrow in meaning compared to the various actual uses of the term angelos in the ancient Greek texts. 

 

In all 186 usages of angelos in the Textus Receptus it means one who is sent to deliver a message.  As we can see the critical meaning of the word describes a function that is performed.  Angelos is not a title like the words king, lord, prince, captain, lieutenant, master, sir, ambassador, and so on.  Angelos is NOT a title meaning heavenly being.  Angelos is a term which describes a function being performed, describing the action of a verb taking place, like the terms runner, welder, plumber, driver, writer, speaker and so on, which words describe the action of running, welding, plumbing, driving, writing and speaking.  Angelos describes the action of delivering a message, which is why I translate it as messenger in the LIT, in every one of its usages.  

 

Another reason why I translate angelos as messenger is because the term is applied to mortal, soul-based beings as well, not to simply to heavenly, spirit-based beings.  In Mat. 1:20 angelos is used by the writer Matthew to refer to the heavenly being which, in a vision, came to Joseph, Mariam's husband, to deliver the message from the LORD that he should not be fearful to take Mariam to himself to be his wife, because the child having been generated in her is "out of holy Spirit".  Yes, this is how angelos is used in the majority of its usages, to refer to a heavenly being delivering a message.  BUT, angelos is used to refer to mortal beings delivering messages also, ones who have been sent to deliver messages to other mortals. 

 

In Mat. 11:10 Jesus Christ, speaking of John the Baptist, quotes the prophecy of Malachi, in Mal. 3:1a:

 

Mat. 11:10 Behold, I send the messenger of me before [the] face of you, who shall schematize down the way of you in front of you...

 

Jesus refers to John the Baptist as Jesus' own messenger, "the messenger of me".  In other various passages in the new testament writings they say that John the Baptist was sent to introduce the prophesied and promised messiah to the children of Israel.  And that he would bring a new covenant which the God the Father wished to make with mortalkind (Jer. 31:31-34; Joel 2:28-32; Acts 2:17-21). 

 

But when we look at Mal. 3:1 we see not only the prophesy of the coming John the Baptist, referred to simply as a messenger, but we see another messenger mentioned as well in Malachi's prophecy, in the same verse.

 

Mal. 3:1a (LIT) Behold, I am sending a messenger of me; and he shall clear the way [of you] before [you].  

 

Mal. 3:1b (LIT) And suddenly, the Lord whom you seek, shall come to his temple, [who is] the messenger of the covenant, whom you are desiring.  Behold, he shall come, says Yehovah of hosts!

 

I can see how Mal. 3:1a speaks of John the Baptist, through corresponding the new covenant revelation, which has subsequently been revealed to us, back to Malachi's prophecy in 3:1a.   But what Jesus said in Mat. 11:10 is silent about what Malachi meant in 3:1b.   But I believe there is another new covenant revelation which corresponds back to Mal. 3:1b, which is given to us in Rev. 19:10 and 22:6-16.

 

Rev. 19:10 (LIT/UBS4) And I fell in front of the feet of him to bow toward (proskunēsai) him.  And [it] says to me, “Do not gaze (hora) [at me]!  I am a slave together with you, and of the brothers of you, of the [brothers] holding the witness of Jesus, (because the Witness of Jesus is the Spirit of the prophecy).  Bow toward (proskunēson) the God!”

 

Who is speaking in this verse, the one who refused to allow the apostle John to bow toward him, but said to him, "Do not gaze [at me]!  Bow toward the God!"?  Whoever is speaking to John considers itself to be a slave of the God together with apostle John, and of the brothers of John, the brothers who are holding the witness of Jesus.  Apostle Paul, speaking of Jesus Christ, says in his letter to the believers in Philippi:

 

Php. 2:7 (LIT/UBS4) BUT, having taken a form of a slave in a likeness of mortals, he emptied himself!  And having become [a slave], he having found [himself in] a scheme as a mortal,

Paul says Jesus Christ voluntarily took the form of a slave to his Father the God; a slave in the likeness of mortals.

 

Brothers in Rev. 19:10 must not mean brothers in the sense of fellow children of Israel, or brothers after the flesh.  Brothers here must mean as Jesus described in Mat. 12:49-50:

 

Mat. 12:49 (LIT/UBS4) And having stretched out the hand of him over the disciples of him, he enunciated, “Behold, the mother of me and the brothers of me!

 

Mat. 12:50 (LIT/UBS4) Because perhaps anyone who may do the desire of the Father of me, the one in [the] heavens, he is a brother of me, and a sister, and a mother.”

 

In Rev. 22:8-9 apostle John attempts to bow toward this messenger again, and again receives the same treatment and explanation.

 

Rev. 22:8 (LIT/UBS4) And I, John, [am] the one hearing and looking at these things.  And when I heard and looked, I fell in front to bow toward the feet of the messenger, of the one pointing out (deiknuontos) to me these things.

 

Rev. 22:9 (LIT/UBS4) And he says to me, “Do not gaze [at me]!  I am a slave together with you, and of the brothers of you, of the prophets, and of the ones watching the words of the little scroll of this.  Bow toward the God!”

 

This messenger speaking to apostle John says again that he is a brother of the ones watching the words of the little scroll, i.e., of the ones doing the desire of the Father, as Jesus said in Mat. 12:50.   Could this messenger be Christ Jesus himself, the messenger apostle John speaks of in Rev. 22:8, the messenger Malachi speaks of in 3:1b?

 

What does the opening verse, Rev. 1:1, of the scroll of Revelation of Jesus Christ say about who is giving apostle John this revelation?

 

Rev. 1:1 (LIT/UBS4) A revelation of Jesus Christ which the God gave to him to point out (deixai) to the slaves of him things which [are] necessary to come to pass in acceleration.  And He [the God] signified [it] having sent [it] through the messenger (angelou) of Him to the slave (doulō) of him, John (iōannē);

 

A revelation of Jesus Christ - Jesus Christ is making known this revelation, and he is making it known to apostle John.

 

which the God gave to him - The God gave this revelation to His son Jesus Christ.

 

to point out to the slaves of him - Slaves of who?  In the new covenant writings slaves is used in reference to both slaves of the God the Father, and slaves of Jesus Christ.  Here in John's account of the revelation he received from Jesus Christ, John's references to slaves are always slaves of the God (Rev. 7:3, 10:7, 11:18, 15:3, 19:2, 5, 22:3, 6), with the apparent exception of this first verse which reference to slaves appears to me to refer to those of Jesus Christ.

 

And He signified [it] - I believe the one who gave the revelation to Jesus Christ is the one who signified it, who is the God the Father.

 

having sent [it] through the messenger of Him - I believe the one who gave the revelation to Jesus Christ, is the same one who signified it, and is the same one who sent it, who is the God the Father.  Here the God the Father refers to His son, Jesus Christ, as His messenger.  This revelation which was given to Jesus Christ from the God was sent THROUGH His messenger Jesus Christ to Jesus' slave John.

 

to the slave of him - John is the slave of him, Jesus, through whom the God gave, signified and sent it.

 

To me, this scriptural evidence establishes who is the second messenger in Malachi 3:1b.  In Malachi 3:1a Jesus said John the Baptist was the messenger of him (Mat. 11:10).  In Rev. 22:8 John says he bowed toward the feet of the messerger who was speaking to him.  This messenger is defined in John 1:1 as the God the Father's messenger, Jesus Christ, to whom that revelation was given and signified, and through whom it was sent to Jesus' slave, John.

 

This evidence in God's Word identifies for me who is the second messenger mentioned in Malichi's prophecy in 3:1b, as being the ascended Christ Jesus himself.  In Malachi 3:1a the first messenger mentioned is John the Baptist, Jesus' messenger; and in Mal. 3:1b the second messenger mentioned is the ascended Jesus Christ himself, the messenger of his Father, the God.

 

Mal. 3:1a (LIT) Behold, I am sending a messenger of me; and he shall clear the way [of you] before [you].  

 

Mal. 3:1b (LIT) And suddenly, the Lord whom you seek, shall come to his temple, [who is] the messenger of the covenant, whom you are desiring.  Behold, he shall come, says Yehovah of hosts!

 

And suddenly - When Jesus Christ, the promised messiah, finally arrived, the religious leaders refused to believe it, and they led the children of Israel in their unbelief as well, actually threatening anyone who spoke as though they believed, or said they believed it.

 

the Lord whom you seek - There were many of the children of Israel who were actually looking forward to and expecting the coming of the promised messiah, as Jesus' messenger, John the Baptist, was announcing and preaching.

 

shall come to his temple - I believe this is the new "temple" made without hands (Mat. 26:61; Mark 14:58; John 2:19-21), the one body of Christ, the new homestead of the God (1 Cor. 3:16-17, 6:15-20; 2 Cor. 6:16; Eph. 2:21; Rev. 7:13-17, 21:22).

 

the messenger of the covenant - Please see Rom. 11:26-27; Heb. 12:24, 13:20, Heb. chapters 8-13.  This is the new covenant in Jesus Christ's shed blood, which new covenant was prophesied to come (Heb. 10:16-17; Jer. 31:31-34).

 

I believe this shows that a messenger, Gk. angelos, is not simply a heavenly being, but its usage throughout God's Word refers to both heavenly and mortal beings, and even to Jesus Christ himself, as I've shown here, who is the greatest messenger of all time, being the Word of God, and being the messenger of the new covenant in his shed blood.  I believe this demonstrates also that when we read God's Word, especially in passages where up until now we may have thought that some other angel or messenger was speaking, that it could possibly be God's Word speaking, before it was made flesh, as in Mal. 3:1, or the ascended Word made flesh speaking, Christ Jesus speaking, as he occasionally does throughout John's record of the revelation of Jesus Christ, as I've shown here in Rev. 19:10 and 22:9.  We must NOT jump to conclusions about WHO or WHAT is the messenger about which we are reading, but allow the contexts, immediate, local and remote, as I've shown, to define for us WHO or WHAT is the messenger.